Bargaining with revoking costs

نویسنده

  • Rohan Dutta
چکیده

A simple two stage bilateral bargaining game is analyzed. The players simultaneously demand shares of a unit size pie in the first stage. If the demands add up to more than one, both players, in the second stage, simultaneously choose whether to stick to their demand or accept the other’s offer. While both parties sticking to their offers leads to an impasse, accepting a lower share than the original demand is costly for each party. The set of pure strategy subgame perfect equilibria of the game is characterized for continuous payoff functions strictly increasing in the pie share and continuous cost functions, strictly increasing in the amount conceded. Higher cost functions are shown to improve bargaining power. The limit equilibrium prediction of the model, as the cost functions are made arbitrarily high, selects a unique equilibrium in the Nash Demand

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Bargaining Model Based on the Commitment Tactic

This paper studies a one-shot, simultaneous-move bargaining game. Each bargainer makes a partial commitment (a share of the unit size cake that she would like to get), which can later be revoked at some cost to the player. The payoffs are defined, in part, by the Nash bargaining solution, where the feasible utility set is affected by the players' partial commitments. Under certain assumptions o...

متن کامل

Price Negotiation and Bargaining Costs∗

We study the role of consumers’ psychological bargaining costs associated with the decision to bargain in a retail setting. First, we use a simple model to show how a retailer’s optimal pricing strategy (fixed pricing vs. bargaining) varies with consumers’ bargaining costs and the retailer’s marginal costs. We then prove how these fixed bargaining costs can be nonparametrically identified separ...

متن کامل

Wage bargaining and turnover costs with heterogeneous labor and asymmetric information

We study a model of individual wage bargaining between heterogeneous workers and firms, with instantaneous matching, free firm entry, workers’ individual productivities are discovered by firms only after being hired, and it is expensive for firms to hire and fire workers. We show that inefficiencies due to bargaining and externalities in the matching process lead firms to employ too few worker ...

متن کامل

Is There a Hold–up Problem?

Most literature on the hold–up problem assumes that ex post bargaining outcomes are insensitive to prior investment costs. However, many bargaining procedures admit multiple equilibria and hence allow investment costs to affect bargaining outcomes. On the other hand, multiplicity of equilibria leaves scope for coordination failure. We report on three experiments in which unilateral investment i...

متن کامل

Bargaining Before or After Communication?

The paper has benefited greatly from comments by an anonymous referee and numerous seminar participants as well as discussions with Abstract We ask how bargainers' incentives to communicate about more efficient widget designs depend on whether they negotiate price prior to, or after, fixing the traded design. We find three effects: (1) Since communication reveals information about preferences, ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Games and Economic Behavior

دوره 74  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012